Week 5
How do you judge the value of expertise on the Web? Does it differ from your notion of expertise in face-to-face settings? Why or why not?
For me the largest divide between expertise on the Web and expertise face-to-face is how you determine their credibility in the field their are discusses. Most lectures or instructions that are face-to-face the presenter provides a detail of their background or experiences to gain credibility for their experience. Additionally, the speaker is normally backed by an organization or university that has also vouched for their expertise in the matter.
On the Web, articles or blogs are sometimes backed with a bio and references but it is in the hands of the reader to determine their credibility. Often, I will come across an article and it will provide no background on the author but I can normally search the name and find out their experience in subject matter.
Additionally because the Web updates so frequently from such a large number of sources, statically data doesn't always align and how do you determine which one to go with. I have also found it is difficult to rely solely on Web sources for my Academic purposes due to credibility or validity of the source. This class has changed my perspective on that and I feel that the Web is making major strides to define credible online sources.
Whats your opinion?